Pregnancy Ultrasound Evaluation (2024)

Continuing Education Activity

The use of ultrasound in pregnancy is vast and has become the standard of care. This activity describes different applications of ultrasound in pregnancy, focusing on the importance of recognizing critical findings in acute and routine settings along with the associated management strategies. In addition, the role of the interprofessional healthcare team involved in the intricate management of the pregnant patient is discussed.

Objectives:

• Identify the indications and contraindications of ultrasound in pregnancy.

• Assessthe equipment and technique used in ultrasounds during pregnancy.

• Evaluatedifferent uses of ultrasound in pregnancy in routine versus emergent settings.

• Communicatethe importance of improving care coordination amongst the interprofessional team to enhance care delivery for pregnant patients.

Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.

Introduction

The use of ultrasound in the setting of pregnancy is vast and has become the standard of care in the evaluation of pregnant women. The average number of ultrasounds performed during pregnancy has increased from 1.5 in 1995 to 1997 to 2.7 from 2005 to 2006, with even higher numbers of ultrasound studies obtained for high-risk pregnancies.[1]The use of ultrasound during pregnancy is growing and is utilized in both routine monitoring as well as in an acute setting of trauma or pregnancy complications.

Anatomy and Physiology

Ultrasound can be used transvaginally or transabdominally to view the female reproductive anatomy, with a transvaginal approachallowing for better visualization of structures. The uterus is located posterior to the bladder and anterior to the colon. The3 parts of the uterus can be visualized using transvaginal ultrasound, beginning with most caudal: the cervix, body, and then the fundus. The uterus contains the gestational sac during pregnancy, typically visualized in the center of the uterine at 4.5 to 5 weeks of gestation. It is also the first structure visualized during pregnancy.[2][3]The ovaries and Fallopian tubes are paired female reproductive organs that can be found lateral to the uterus. The fetal heartbeat becomes detectable at 6 weeks of gestational age and is described initially as a“flickering” structure. The placenta is visible by 10 weeks gestational age with a transabdominal ultrasound. It appears as a uniformly echogenic structure with rounded margins, usually located along the anterior or posterior uterine wall, where it is seen as a thickened echogenic rim of tissue surrounding the gestational sac.[4]

Indications

Suppose there are no symptoms of concern during pregnancy. In that case, a routine ultrasound should be performed at 10 to 13 weeks gestational age to establish accurate gestational age, determine viability, and determine the number of fetuses [5].However, in the presence of concerning symptoms such as vaginal bleeding, abdominal or pelvic pain in a female with a positive pregnancy test, an emergent pelvic ultrasound must be performed to rule out an ectopic pregnancy.

In the setting where a female of reproductive age presents with minor or major trauma, pregnancy is automatically assumed until it is ruled out with serum or urine pregnancy tests.[6]During the FAST (Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma) exam, a transabdominal ultrasound is performed to assess for free fluid in the abdomen and to investigate the potential presence of intrauterine pregnancy (IUP).If IUP is identified, further assessment should include fetal heart rate,the amount of amniotic fluid, fetal movement, and the placenta. In cases of traumatic injury in females with confirmed or estimated pregnancy greater than 20 weeks gestation,OBGYN expert consultation should be sought as soon as possible, and a transabdominal ultrasound must be performed to evaluate fetal well-being as soon as the mother is stabilized.

Contraindications

While the only absolute contraindication to transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound is patient refusal, the use of transvaginal ultrasound may be relatively contraindicated late into pregnancy term or in the high-risk patient population.[7]Special consideration should be made in the acute setting with a pregnant patient with vaginal bleeding and an unknown past medical history. In this case, a transabdominal ultrasound should be performed first to evaluate the placenta, followed by a transvaginal ultrasound and speculum examination to see if it is safe. However, transvaginal ultrasound is relatively safe in the setting of placenta previa as the angle between the cervix and the vaginal probe is adequate to prevent the probe from slipping into the cervix and disrupting the placenta.[8]

Equipment

The equipment needed to perform a 2-D prenatal ultrasound includes2 ultrasound probes. A high-frequency transvaginal probe (7.5-10 MHz) is used for a transvaginal portion of the examination, and the curvilinear probe (1-6 MHz) is used in the transabdominal approach.[9]

Technique or Treatment

The overall technique for transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound is the same for all pregnancies, but it differs in the setting of the initial evaluation of pregnancy with trauma. The transabdominal view in pregnancy is obtained using the curvilinear probe with the patient in a supine position. The probe is placed with the indicator to the head of the patient above the pubis symphysis in the midline. An adequate view of the uterus includes having the length of the uterus in addition to the cervix and part of the vagina visualized.[10]It is important to distinguish the endometrial stripe in the transverse view as a dot or oval and the vaginal as a stripe going across the screen. For transabdominal assessment, it is best to obtain imagining in both longitudinal and transverse views.

During a transvaginal examination, the tactile indicator on the probe handle is pointed up towards the ceiling, and the probe is inserted approximately 4 to 5 cm in the sagittal plane. The first and critical step is the determination of landmarks in which the bladder is identified. Subsequently, the juxtaposition between the bladder and the uterus is recognized, which makes it less likely that the exam is being performed in the adnexa.[10]Next,the ovaries and Fallopian tubes must beinvestigated when suspicion is high for ectopic pregnancy; the most common location for an ectopic pregnancy is the ampulla of the fallopian tube.[11]In the setting of trauma, the patient should undergo an assessment with an ultrasound of the abdomen with a FAST exam to evaluate for free fluid in the peritoneal cavity and pericardium. The FAST exam is performed with a curvilinear probe. It evaluates the right upper quadrant (Morrison pouch), left upper quadrant, subxiphoid, and suprapubic, with additional attention spent evaluating the uterus for intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) while in this position.

Complications

The overall risk of complications with ultrasound is low; however, a transvaginal ultrasound may cause complications such as anxiety, pain, or vaginal bleeding.

Clinical Significance

Ultrasound is the most commonly used diagnostic procedure in obstetrics. Ultrasound is a convenient, painless procedure that yields immediate results and is considered widely safe.[12]Ultrasound has uses in both routine care and acute or emergent settings.The goal of ultrasound during routine prenatal care is to establish viability, determine gestational age, and assess the number of fetuses.[13]Fetal viability is confirmed by the presence of an embryo that has cardiac activity.Cardiac activity is often present when the embryo measures 2 mm or greater during the 6th week of gestation.[5]If cardiac activity is not evident, other sonographic features of early pregnancy can predict viability. Since the first sonographic evidence of pregnancy is the gestational sac (which can be visualized at 4.5 to 5 weeks), its growth and progression are used to assess viability in early pregnancy. The gestational sac should increase by 1.13 mm a day in normal pregnancy.[2][14]The caliper function is used to obtain gestational sac diameter with ultrasound and then placed from the inner to the outer wall of the gestational sac. The mean sac diameter (MSD) is calculated by adding the longitudinal, anteroposterior, and transverse dimensions of the chorionic space, taking the sum of these 3 measurements, and dividing the sum by 3 to obtain the MSD.[15]Tracking the progression of the MSD through early pregnancy helps predict potential pregnancy failure. AnMSD of 25 mm with no embryo indicates pregnancy failure, while an MSD between 16 and 25 mm without an embryo is suggestive of a possible pregnancy failure.[16][17]Another predictor of non-viability is the absence of cardiac activity in an embryo with a crown-rump length (CRL) greater than 7 mm.CRL is measured by taking the average of 3 measurements of the longest fetal length.[18]CRListaken by placing the calipers on the measurement setting and measuring the maximum straight-line length of the embryo in the longitudinal axis. It is important to ensure that the embryo isn't too flexed or too extended when measuring CRL.[15]

The yolk sac size and shape can be used to predict viability. The yolk sac can be evaluated as early as 5 weeks.Abnormal yolk sac shape (non-round or oval)predicts poor pregnancy outcomes with a sensitivity of 29% and a specificity of 95%.[19]Other characteristics of the yolk sac associated with poor outcomes include the size(smaller than 2 mm or larger than 5 mm in diameter) and the presence of a hyperechoic or hypoechoic rim, hyperechoic yolk sac center, or a number of yolk sacs unequal to the number of embryos. Abnormal yolk sac size and shape are associated with statistically significant higher abortion rates.[20]

Subchorionic hemorrhage is another condition associated with poor pregnancy outcomes that can be assessed with ultrasound. The overall spontaneous abortion rate is doubled in pregnancy cases in which the separation between the uterine wall and the chorionic membrane is considered large compared to small or moderate. A large separation is found to be associated with an approximate 3 fold increase in spontaneous abortion rates.[21]In addition to the size of the hemorrhage, the identification of subchorionic hemorrhage earlier in pregnancy is associated with higher rates of subsequent pregnancy failure.[22]Fetal bradycardia during the first trimester is another important predictor for potential fetal demise. Fetalbradycardia in the early first trimester below 80 bpm is an ominous sign, and physicians should prepare their patients for likely poor outcomes such as spontaneous abortion and potential intrauterine fetal demise. Follow-up scans are done weekly until the heart rate is no longer present or until it becomes normal.[23]

It is recommended that all pregnant women undergo a routine ultrasound at 10 to 13 weeks of gestation to determine an accurate gestational age. Getting an accurate gestational age is highly important and pertinent for the optimal assessment of fetal growth later in pregnancy. Ultrasound is the most reliable method for establishing a true gestational age by measurement of crown-rump length, which can be measured either transabdominally or transvaginally. CRL allows for an accurate determination of the day of conception +/- 5 days in 95% of pregnancies.Between11 and 13.6 weeks gestation, it is recommended that CRL be used to determine gestational age unless it is >84 mm, then head circumference should be used as it is slightly more precise when compared to biparietal diameter.Head circumference is measured around the outer table of the fetal skull. The technique ofbiparietal diameter measurement depends on the nomogram used. If the nomogram uses outer-to-outer measurements of the fetal skull, the same should be done during a fetal ultrasound. However, nomograms of the skull's outer edge and the skull's inner edge are also available. To obtain reliable information, the largest symmetric axial view of the fetal head must be used to visualize the choroid plexus, the third ventricle, or the thalamus.[5]

Toward the end of the first trimester, a routine scan offers the opportunity to detect any visible gross fetal abnormalities. Measuring nuchal translucency in the first trimester has been associated with having high sensitivity and specificity for identifying pregnancies at risk for chromosomal anomalies, the cut-off being 3 mm or greater.[24]Not all fetal abnormalities manifest in the first trimester; thus, it is important to undergo standard transabdominal ultrasound during the second trimester.[25]

Another important goal of the routine obstetric ultrasound at 10 to 13 weeks of gestation is determining the number of fetuses, amnionicity, and chorionicity in twin gestations. The absence or presence of the intertwin membrane determines amnionicity. If nointertwin membrane is identified, pregnancy is described as "mono-amniotic and mono-chorionic," and it implies the highest potential rate of complications (cord entanglement and fetal death).[26]Chorionicity describes different types of placentation and also predicts risks in twin pregnancies. Ifintertwin membrane is identified, monochorionic or dichorionic placentation is investigated next. Monochorionic placentation has a single placenta, while dichorionic placentation describes2 separate placentas in twin pregnancies. To determine chorionicity, the chorionic membrane base and thickness are evaluated. The presence of the lambda sign (a thick, Y-shaped base of the chorion) is used to predict chorionicity with greater than 95% accuracy, but only if it's used before 14 weeks of gestation. If the lambda sign is identified, a dichorionic pregnancy is diagnosed.[27]

In the second trimester, thegoal of a routine ultrasound examination,typically performed between 18 and 22 weeks, is to assess the fetal anatomy and further evaluate the placenta.[28]The reported advantages of routine ultrasound include early detection of many major anomalies, earlier determination of genetic diagnosis, and easier pregnancy termination if appropriate.[5]Ultrasound evaluation of the placenta can confirm that the placenta has been implanted in the correct anatomical positionand help recognizevariations of placenta previa or placenta accreta. During the second trimester, the placental volume can be measured and calculated using volume organ computer-aided analysis. This measurement of placental volume aids in predicting neonatal birth weights. Women with lower mean second-trimester placental volumes have higher rates of neonates born small for gestational age than those with normal placental volumes in the appropriate gestational age group.Placental volumes for theappropriate gestational age group were typically measured with ultrasound at 213.5 ± 75.8 versus thesmall for gestational age group at 170.6 ± 49.8.[29]

As opposed to asymptomatic pregnant patients undergoing routine obstetric ultrasound imaging, pregnant patients with concerning symptoms must be evaluated on an emergent basis. In cases in which a stable patient presents for an evaluation of pelvic pain, abdominal pain, or vaginal bleeding early in suspected pregnancy, it is important first to establish a diagnosis of an IUP. If pelvic ultrasound reveals an IUP, it can be assumed that the cause of symptoms is unlikely to be secondary to an ectopic pregnancy.[30]However, it is important to consider heterotopic pregnancy, which is defined as the simultaneous presence of intrauterine and ectopic pregnancies; this condition is more common in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization or women who have a history of tubal disease. The incidence of ectopic pregnancy is 0.006 to 0.001% in spontaneous cases, while in assisted reproductive techniques, such as in-vitro fertilization, it is 1 to 3%.[31]Once ectopic pregnancy is ruled out, other causes of vaginal bleeding or pelvic pain may be considered, such as spontaneous abortion, threatened abortion, gestational trophoblastic neoplasm, trauma, or, most commonly, normal pregnancy. Management of a stable patient with minimal bleeding in early pregnancy includes outpatient follow-up within 1 to 2 days and strict return precautions. It must be noted that for pelvic pain or vaginal bleeding complaints that occur later in pregnancy (>23 weeks), a speculum or digital vaginal exam should be held until placenta previa is ruled out by ultrasound.[6]Placenta previa accounts for 13 percent of maternal deaths secondary to hemorrhage in the United States in a recent report.It is associated with other complications, including the need for blood transfusion, organ injury, need for hysterectomy, venous thromboembolism, and increased infection risk, making identification of placenta previa an important part of obstetric ultrasound.[32]

Trauma in pregnancy is the leading cause of non-obstetric maternal mortality. Non-lethal injuries during pregnancy most commonly occur from motor vehicle accidents and domestic/intimate partner violence. Although most injuries during pregnancy are classified as minor, fetal losses that are associated with minor trauma range from 60 to 70%. Importantly, any female of reproductive age with minor or majorinjury should be assumed pregnant until proven otherwise. The immediate focus is always on stabilizing the patient. Once successfully stabilized, all female patients of reproductive age should undergo a definitive pregnancy test or an ultrasound scan. In the setting of trauma, the patient may not be conscious or able to report their pregnancy status or gestational age; thus, estimating gestational age with bedside ultrasound can be a useful tool. Identifying pregnancy and estimating gestational agecan help anticipate the need for prompt delivery. Ultrasound can assist in the evaluation of fetal cardiac rate and rhythm, amniotic fluid volume, placental localization, exclusion of previa, delineating possible fetal injury, and confirming fetal demise. If a patient is estimated to be >20 weeks gestation, fetal monitoring should be initiated as soon as possible in a stable patient.In the setting of trauma in pregnancy, a critical concern is placental abruption. This condition occurs most commonly in trauma in which the patient experiences intense and severe uterine pain, in addition to uterine contractions and vaginal bleeding. It is important to note that ultrasound for detecting placental abruption has poor sensitivity; however, it is very specific if identified, resulting in a positive predictive value of 88% if seen and a negative predictive value of 53% if not identified. Thus, prolonged fetal monitoring is advised in pregnant patients with trauma. A follow-up obstetric ultrasound and examination should be done 2 weeks after any hospital admission for either maternal or fetal factors (regardless of the gestational age) to document and assess normalcy after the traumatic event.[6][33]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

The care of a pregnant patient requires coordination between an interprofessional team comprised of physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals.Not every complaint in pregnancy is an obstetric emergency; however, it is important to recognize and promptly diagnose the conditions that have been discussed above (ectopic pregnancy, placental abruption, etc). The use of rapid bedside ultrasound by emergency department providers improves patient outcomes. It allows for rapid assessment of both mother and baby, which aids in communicating more rapidly with the obstetrical specialists in surgical obstetric emergencies. Ultrasound reduces maternal and neonatal mortality in primary care facilities and should be included in the assessment by all providers routinely caring for pregnant patients.[33]

Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Interventions

Whena stable pregnant patient presents for an evaluation with complaints of pelvic pain, vaginal bleeding, or trauma, the initial action is to get the patient on a monitor and obtain a full set of vital signs. Vital signs must be monitored closely in the pregnant patient to ensure shock is promptly recognized.In addition to cardiac monitoring and continuous pulse oximetry, 2 large-bore intravenous lines must be established, coordinating care between the physician and nursing staff of paramount importance. In cases when an unstable female patient presents for an evaluation in an acute setting (eg, the emergency department),staffmust work together to ensure that portable bedside ultrasound is available and ready for use by trauma or emergency medicine providers (preferably before the unstable patient arrives).While the primary assessment is being performed, nursing staff should obtain a full set of vital signs and establish at least 2 large-bore IVs. In cases of known pregnancy or if bedside ultrasound reveals pregnancy, emergent consultation with obstetrical specialists must be requested. Nurses should be prepared and plan for a prompt sign-out toobstetrical services in the settingof a pregnant patient.[33]

References

1.

Siddique J, Lauderdale DS, VanderWeele TJ, Lantos JD. Trends in prenatal ultrasound use in the United States: 1995 to 2006. Med Care. 2009 Nov;47(11):1129-35. [PubMed: 19786915]

2.

Doubilet PM. Ultrasound evaluation of the first trimester. Radiol Clin North Am. 2014 Nov;52(6):1191-9. [PubMed: 25444100]

3.

Richardson A, Gallos I, Dobson S, Campbell BK, Coomarasamy A, Raine-Fenning N. Accuracy of first-trimester ultrasound in diagnosis of intrauterine pregnancy prior to visualization of the yolk sac: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;46(2):142-9. [PubMed: 25393076]

4.

Fadl S, Moshiri M, Fligner CL, Katz DS, Dighe M. Placental Imaging: Normal Appearance with Review of Pathologic Findings. Radiographics. 2017 May-Jun;37(3):979-998. [PubMed: 28493802]

5.

Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Bilardo CM, Chalouhi GE, Ghi T, Kagan KO, Lau TK, Papageorghiou AT, Raine-Fenning NJ, Stirnemann J, Suresh S, Tabor A, Timor-Tritsch IE, Toi A, Yeo G. ISUOG practice guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;41(1):102-13. [PubMed: 23280739]

6.

Jain V, Chari R, Maslovitz S, Farine D, Maternal Fetal Medicine Committee. Bujold E, Gagnon R, Basso M, Bos H, Brown R, Cooper S, Gouin K, McLeod NL, Menticoglou S, Mundle W, Pylypjuk C, Roggensack A, Sanderson F. Guidelines for the Management of a Pregnant Trauma Patient. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Jun;37(6):553-74. [PubMed: 26334607]

7.

Narayanan M, Tafti D, Cohen HL. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): May 22, 2023. Pelvic Ultrasound. [PubMed: 29262064]

8.

Timor-Tritsch IE, Yunis RA. Confirming the safety of transvaginal sonography in patients suspected of placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 May;81(5 ( Pt 1)):742-4. [PubMed: 8469465]

9.

Mausner Geffen E, Slywotzky C, Bennett G. Pitfalls and tips in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 May;42(5):1524-1542. [PubMed: 28144719]

10.

Baker M, dela Cruz J. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Jan 16, 2023. Ectopic Pregnancy, Ultrasound. [PubMed: 29489174]

11.

Chukus A, Tirada N, Restrepo R, Reddy NI. Uncommon Implantation Sites of Ectopic Pregnancy: Thinking beyond the Complex Adnexal Mass. Radiographics. 2015 May-Jun;35(3):946-59. [PubMed: 25860721]

12.

Abramowicz JS. Benefits and risks of ultrasound in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol. 2013 Oct;37(5):295-300. [PubMed: 24176149]

13.

Elson J, Salim R, Tailor A, Banerjee S, Zosmer N, Jurkovic D. Prediction of early pregnancy viability in the absence of an ultrasonically detectable embryo. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jan;21(1):57-61. [PubMed: 12528163]

14.

Blaas HG. Detection of structural abnormalities in the first trimester using ultrasound. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Apr;28(3):341-53. [PubMed: 24355991]

15.

Ali S, Byanyima RK, Ononge S, Ictho J, Nyamwiza J, Loro ELE, Mukisa J, Musewa A, Nalutaaya A, Ssenyonga R, Kawooya I, Temper B, Katamba A, Kalyango J, Karamagi C. Measurement error of mean sac diameter and crown-rump length among pregnant women at Mulago hospital, Uganda. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 04;18(1):129. [PMC free article: PMC5935951] [PubMed: 29728143]

16.

Doubilet PM, Benson CB, Bourne T, Blaivas M, Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Multispecialty Panel on Early First Trimester Diagnosis of Miscarriage and Exclusion of a Viable Intrauterine Pregnancy. Barnhart KT, Benacerraf BR, Brown DL, Filly RA, Fox JC, Goldstein SR, Kendall JL, Lyons EA, Porter MB, Pretorius DH, Timor-Tritsch IE. Diagnostic criteria for nonviable pregnancy early in the first trimester. N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 10;369(15):1443-51. [PubMed: 24106937]

17.

Preisler J, Kopeika J, Ismail L, Vathanan V, Farren J, Abdallah Y, Battacharjee P, Van Holsbeke C, Bottomley C, Gould D, Johnson S, Stalder C, Van Calster B, Hamilton J, Timmerman D, Bourne T. Defining safe criteria to diagnose miscarriage: prospective observational multicentre study. BMJ. 2015 Sep 23;351:h4579. [PMC free article: PMC4580727] [PubMed: 26400869]

18.

Kapfhamer JD, Palaniappan S, Summers K, Kassel K, Mancuso AC, Ryan GL, Shah DK. Difference between mean gestational sac diameter and crown-rump length as a marker of first-trimester pregnancy loss after invitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2018 Jan;109(1):130-136. [PMC free article: PMC6248327] [PubMed: 29175064]

19.

Küçük T, Duru NK, Yenen MC, Dede M, Ergün A, Başer I. Yolk sac size and shape as predictors of poor pregnancy outcome. J Perinat Med. 1999;27(4):316-20. [PubMed: 10560085]

20.

Moradan S, Forouzeshfar M. Are abnormal yolk sac characteristics important factors in abortion rates? Int J Fertil Steril. 2012 Jul;6(2):127-30. [PMC free article: PMC4258241] [PubMed: 25493170]

21.

Bennett GL, Bromley B, Lieberman E, Benacerraf BR. Subchorionic hemorrhage in first-trimester pregnancies: prediction of pregnancy outcome with sonography. Radiology. 1996 Sep;200(3):803-6. [PubMed: 8756935]

22.

Heller HT, Asch EA, Durfee SM, Goldenson RP, Peters HE, Ginsburg ES, Doubilet PM, Benson CB. Subchorionic Hematoma: Correlation of Grading Techniques With First-Trimester Pregnancy Outcome. J Ultrasound Med. 2018 Jul;37(7):1725-1732. [PubMed: 29341210]

23.

Laboda LA, Estroff JA, Benacerraf BR. First trimester bradycardia. A sign of impending fetal loss. J Ultrasound Med. 1989 Oct;8(10):561-3. [PubMed: 2681826]

24.

Conner SN, Longman RE, Cahill AG. The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal genetic syndromes. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Apr;28(3):417-28. [PMC free article: PMC4079588] [PubMed: 24534428]

25.

Achiron R, Tadmor O. Screening for fetal anomalies during the first trimester of pregnancy: transvaginal versus transabdominal sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1991 May 01;1(3):186-91. [PubMed: 12797070]

26.

Killion MM. Twins: The Importance of Chorionicity in Planning Care and Timing of Birth. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2019 Mar/Apr;44(2):115. [PubMed: 30807329]

27.

Maruotti GM, Saccone G, Morlando M, Martinelli P. First-trimester ultrasound determination of chorionicity in twin gestations using the lambda sign: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Jul;202:66-70. [PubMed: 27180271]

28.

Bethune M, Alibrahim E, Davies B, Yong E. A pictorial guide for the second trimester ultrasound. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2013 Aug;16(3):98-113. [PMC free article: PMC5029995] [PubMed: 28191183]

29.

Fang SW, Ou CY, Tsai CC, Fu HC, Cheng HH, Cheng BH, Chang MS, Hsu TY. Second-trimester placental volume and vascular indices in the prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015;37(2):123-8. [PubMed: 25359105]

30.

Varner C, Balaban D, McLeod S, Carver S, Borgundvaag B. Fetal outcomes following emergency department point-of-care ultrasound for vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy. Can Fam Physician. 2016 Jul;62(7):572-578. [PMC free article: PMC4955088] [PubMed: 27829074]

31.

Nabi U, Yousaf A, Ghaffar F, Sajid S, Ahmed MMH. Heterotopic Pregnancy - A Diagnostic Challenge. Six Case Reports and Literature Review. Cureus. 2019 Nov 05;11(11):e6080. [PMC free article: PMC6894893] [PubMed: 31853431]

32.

Wortman AC, Schaefer SL, McIntire DD, Sheffield JS, Twickler DM. Complete Placenta Previa: Ultrasound Biometry and Surgical Outcomes. AJP Rep. 2018 Apr;8(2):e74-e78. [PMC free article: PMC5910059] [PubMed: 29686936]

33.

Murphy NJ, Quinlan JD. Trauma in pregnancy: assessment, management, and prevention. Am Fam Physician. 2014 Nov 15;90(10):717-22. [PubMed: 25403036]